Sunday, September 15, 2013

Petition to DOJ

Dear PAO,
I filed a Motion for Reconsideration to the Resolution of the fiscal recommending the filing of serious physical injuries against me. Do I still have a remedy if my motion is not granted? Does your office give assistance to this kind of problem?
ML

Dear ML,

Resolutions of the prosecutors on the preliminary investigation of criminal complaint filed before them may be appealed to the Secretary of Justice. If your Motion for Reconsideration is denied, you may appeal the same by filing a verified petition for review before the Office of the Secretary of Justice and furnishing copies thereof to the adverse party and the Prosecutor’s Office which issued the resolution (Section 4, NPS Rule on Appeal). Your petition shall be filed within fifteen (15) days from the receipt of the resolution denying your motion for reconsideration (Section 3, NPS Rule on Appeal).

The petition shall contain or state the following: (a) the names and addresses of the parties; (b) the investigation slip number (I.S. No.) and criminal case number, if any, and title of the case, including the offense charged in the complaint; (c) the venue of the preliminary investigation; (d) the specific material dates showing that it was filed on time; (e) a clear and concise statement of the facts, the assignment of errors, and the reasons or arguments relied upon for the allowance of the appeal; and (f) proof of service of a copy of the petition to the adverse party and the Prosecution Office concerned. The petition shall be accompanied by legible duplicate original or certified true copy of the resolution appealed from together with legible true copies of the complaint, affidavits/sworn statements and other evidence submitted by the parties during the preliminary investigation/ reinvestigation. If an information has been filed in court pursuant to the appealed resolution, a copy of the Motion to Defer proceedings filed in court must also accompany the petition (Section 5, NPS Rule on Appeal).

As to your second question, the Public Attorney’s Office (PAO) gives assistance to qualified clients in civil, criminal, labor, administrative and other quasi-judicial cases. To be qualified, the prospective client shall pass both the merit and indigency tests. A case shall be considered meritorious, if an assessment of the law and evidence on hand, discloses that the legal services of the office will assist, or be in aid of, or in the furtherance of justice, taking into consideration the interests of the party and those of society. In criminal cases, the accused enjoys the constitutional presumption of innocence until the contrary is proven, hence, cases of defendants in criminal actions are considered meritorious (Section 2, PAO Operations Manual). On the other hand, the following are considered indigent persons: 1) If residing in Metro Manila, whose net income does not exceed P14,000.00 a month; 2) If residing in other cities, whose net income does not exceed P13,000.00 a month; and 3) If residing in all other places, whose net income does not exceed P12,000.00 a month (Section 3, PAO Operations Manual).

We hope that we were able to answer your queries. Please be reminded that this advice is based solely on the facts you have narrated and our appreciation of the same. Our opinion may vary when other facts are changed or elaborated.

source:  Manila Times' Column of Atty Persida Acosta

No comments:

Post a Comment